Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Larry Amero and Shane Maloney busted in Aussie drug ring



La Press is reporting that Australian police have arrested ten people including eight Canadians involved with a large drug ring connected to Larry Amero and Shane Maloney. As we know those two are waiting trial for their involvement in a large cross border drug ring tied to the Hells Angels that supplied New York with BC Bud and brought back massive amounts of cocaine into Canada to be sold as crack.

This time 650 kg of pseudoephedrine were seized as this drug ring was suspected of importing two tons of precursor chemicals for making crystal meth. That is nasty. Larry Amero is such a piece of garbage. Everybody wants to know where he is so they can put a cap in his ass. His life expectancy outside of prison isn’t very long.

I’ve heard rumors that the police have evidence connecting him to many murders in the BC gang war. If Jamie Bacon is being charged with conspiracy to commit murder in the Surrey Six no doubt Larry Amero should be as well because he was obviously the driving force behind the Bacon brothers disease that is hated so much here in Surrey.

Larry Amero is just another suburban princess. He got beat up in Walnut Grove high school so he started taking steroids. Walnut Grove is in Langley. That is about as far away from the hood as you can get. I know because after I got kicked out of highschool in Surrey I went to Mountain. After I got kicked out of Mountain I had to go back to Surrey. Mountain was a great school. They had an awesome rugby team, great band program and an amazing IB academic program. They weren't into gang banging at all. Walnut Grove was a new school built in the middle of huge subdivisions. Complete yuppiedom. Larry getting beat up there was absolutely pathetic.

Shane Maloney is in a wheelchair. That's why they call him wheels. He's not from Ireland or Montreal. He’s from here. He was enrolled in Burnaby South High School but didn't graduate. He was high school friends with Randy Naicker and Nelson Ramirez, both of whom are now dead. Kim Bolan reported that Nelson had a long criminal history of fraud. Are we beginning to see a pattern yet? Birds of a feather flock together.

One source claims Shane would regularly rip people off in bad drug deals. He's certainly not a promising leader to embrace. He and Larry would get along great. They're both con men.

Update: Shane Maloney pleads guilty

30 comments:

  1. Does Larry Amero and Shane Maloney have criminal records? I assume they do. If so how do they get into countries such as Australia? I doubt the USA would let them in.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since they were both on parole I'm assuming that means they weren't allowed to leave the country and their part of this drug ring was done in Canada. They must have had other people working for them on the other end. However, I am told that the 31 Quebec Hells Angels that were released from prison after Larry Amero was arrested are not happy with Larry's little kiss ass alliances. That means Larry has burnt bridges in BC and Quebec. It sucks to be him right now. If he doesn't spend a lot of time in prison, he'll end up like Jonathon Bacon and Randy Naicker in no time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can you expand on LA's asskiss/licking alliances? Surely they were not motioned without support from his "brothers"??? The fact is, these guys have no fucking clue what it means to have true "brothers;" the kind that will have your back and be there for you 24/7, no hesitation, no questions asked, and expect nothing in return except the sincere L&R they show you. That type of brotherhood is few and far between. They'll never know...

      Delete
    2. It’s pretty obvious the Hells Angels in Quebec were left pretty weak after the police arrested all of them. 31 of them were released because the courts claimed their right to a speedy trial was violated since there was so many arrested at once.

      You are quite right that Larry Amero was acting on club business and it was sanctioned by the Hells Angels. The question is which club. The Quebec guys were always it’s our way or the highway. They don’t like forming alliances they like controlling puppets. That’s what the biker war was all about.

      It’s pretty clear that the Quebec guys supported the Calabrians and Raynald Desjardins who was trying to wipe out Rizzuto’s empire while Vito was in prison. The Quebec HAs get arrested and Vito is released so low and behold they send in Larry Amero the ass kisser. Larry kissed Vito’s ass just like he kissed the UN’s ass here in Surrey. This guy looked the UN in the eye and lied about his support of the Bacon brothers while the Bacon brothers were at war with the UN. He’s a lying b*tch.

      So Larry goes to Montreal after he gets shot by the UN and does what he does best. Starts lying up a storm and kissing everyone’s ass. Not only that but he got caught. That’s two strikes against him with the Quebec members. We all know that you only need one strike against you in the Quebec members eyes before you’re f*cked.

      Delete
    3. Sorry it was the Ontario Hells Angles that supported the Calabrians not the Quebec Hells Angels. The Ontario Hells Angels are f*ck ups. The Quebec Hells Angels are rock solid. That's why the Quebec Hells Angels disbanded the Ontario Nomads after they shot the president and vice president.

      Delete
  3. Amero done his sentence already Agent k? How long was he out?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was on probation waiting trial for the Montreal New york drug ring.

      Delete
  4. That Larry is a dumb fuck. Even dumber then you agent k

    ReplyDelete
  5. Plumber: If I’m so stupid and if I’m such an idiot, then why are you reading my blog? I mean really. There are millions of blogs out there. Who’s the bigger fool? The fool or the guy that obsesses over the fool’s blog? It’s not about me censoring opposing viewpoints. It’s about me censoring idiots. You spam my blog with childish insults then cry to Kim about my censorship. That’s ridiculous.

    That’s like people who spam Kim’s blog with stupid statements like hey Kim, you’re fat. There is no point to that. Kim’s an accomplished journalist. That’s why people read her blog. Throwing out childish insults is pointless. Here we have guys like Dr. Spock that comes up with thought provoking Dr. Phil critiques along with reference to Thomas Acquaintance. It doesn’t get any better than that.

    However, I do censor trolls. My blog is for the alternative viewpoint. If people spam my blog with HA ass kissing then I don’t bother approving those comments. It’s not censorship per say it’s just a breath of fresh air.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kim is a big gal.. i am not a troll but you still censored me. i didnt spam you, didnt kiss ha ass, didnt throw out childish insults but you still censored me. i dont blame you for censoring those who do those things but you censored me because you didn't agree with my viewpoint and that is childish. love the blog but please don't act like your above censoring opponents viewpoints.

      Delete
    2. I was referring to Plumber. Everything they say is a childish insult. I can’t remember what you said that I didn’t approve but the point of my blog is to present an alternative view. When people keep posting 81 love I don’t bother approving that. There are a lot more HA support sites for that kind of stuff than there are sites like mine for the other side.

      Delete
    3. i realize that you were referring to plumber but in those comments you portrayed yourself as only censoring trolls and that's not accurate and please don't say your blog is a place for alternative viewpoints when you censor alternative viewpoints.

      i wouldn't expect you to remember what you censored me for, but for the record it was my view on your anti-palestinian prejudice.

      Delete
    4. Anti-Palestinian prejudice? Oh my that subject is a toxic wasteland and that accusation is simply untrue. I worked on a Kibbutz in Israel. I totally support justice and oppose extremism on both sides of that conflict. I support the Oasis of Peace in Israel which supports religious freedom for both Jews and Palestinians. Abraham was the one known as Israel ya know. He was the father of both sides of that dysfunctional family.

      Gaza is separate from the rest of Palestine. The Palestinians weren’t the original inhabitants of Gaza the Philistines were. Gaza firing rockets into Israel right after Israel pulled out and gave them more autonomy was messed us. Israel using white phosphorus on Gaza in response was excessive. Gaza has always had a history of insanity. That’s why I said it should be given to Egypt since Ramses was the one who historically conquered it in the past and carried away its original inhabitants into captivity.

      None of that however, has anything to do with the Hells Angels or the Vancouver gang war. My blog is for expressing the alternative viewpoint on the Hells Angels. It’s not for promoting anti Semitism or anti Muslim propaganda.

      Delete
    5. yes and the accusation is backed up by your own words. when gaza fires rockets its "messed up" but when israel uses "white phosphorus" its "excessive", excessive? yeah and also banned by the geneva convention, funny how you didn't take that same casual approach to chemical weapons when syria used them on civilians.

      i appreciate your history lesson regarding the original inhabitants of gaza but i'am not sure how that helps the situation that's happening there now?

      if your blog is for expressing the alternate viewpoint on the ha then why post articles about israel/gaza? if your going to use your blog as a soapbox for your views on middle east politics then you should be prepared for debate, instead you post your views, refuse to publish dissenting opinions whilst waving your freedom of speech/alternate viewpoint flag. i never said anything that was anti-semetic or anti-muslim, all i did was point out your bias.

      Delete
    6. I have an opinion that’s for sure. However, I really don’t think my referring to Israel’s use of white phosphorous on civilians in Gaza as being excessive in any way rationalizes or minimizes my opposition to what they did. I’m the one talking about it. Most everyone else isn’t. Am I biased towards Israel? In a way, yes. I believe Israel has a right to exist just like everyone else and I oppose anyone that is determined to wipe them off the face of the earth. That doesn’t mean I support forced evictions. I do not believe Israel is always right. History would boldly declare otherwise.

      Yet I also oppose anyone who wants to wipe all the Muslims or all the Palestinians off the face of the earth. I am what the Irish refer to as a Republican. I believe in a free republic that guarantees religious freedom which includes the right to be atheist.

      If someone has something intelligent to say in opposition to something I post, I usually approve that comment without hesitation. I might clarify my position to the point where we agree to disagree. However, I’m not going to let people to keep going on and on about their opinion after we have clarified the disagreement. After all, this is my blog. People are free to create their own blog to promote their own opinions. I certainly wouldn’t try to spam or highjack someone else’s blog if I disagreed with what they had to say. I totally support free speech and their right to say what they want on their blog. That’s what makes a free republic free.

      My history lesson about the original inhabitants of Gaza was simply to point out that the Palestinians in Gaze were not the original occupants of that area. They don’t have an indigenous claim to that parcel of land. History is full of one group conquering another. The challenge for us today is to find a way to coexist in peace and respect civil liberty.

      Delete
    7. a couple final points:

      1. the term "excessive" does minimize the scale of what happened, its like saying what happened to janice shore was excessive, if you knew what white phosporous did to people then you would have picked a better adjective to describe israels actions than "excessive".

      2. please don't try to justify your censorship by implying that i must have a) said something that wasn't intelligent, b) kept going on and on or c)attempted to hijack or spam your blog. i did none of those things, you censored me because you didn't appreciate your own foibles being exposed.

      3. i asked you how your history lesson helped the situation thats happening now and you replied with a four sentence paragraph that didn't answer my question, you should go into politics.

      alright, iam done with this, i really didnt want to get into the whole anti-palestinian bias thing again, i only posted on here because you were claiming that you dont censor viewpoints, only idiots, when that is incorrect, sorry, i know nobody likes to be shown to be a hypocrite, especially one as self-righteous as you. again, love the blog!

      Delete
    8. On the subject of white phosphorous, aka "willie peter".......It's primary use is as a marker round for artillery. Whereas low velocity "launched grenade" type weapon systems can use a "smoke grenade" type round to mark targets, artillery or mortar rounds impact with much higher velocity and the round breaks up, destroying the projectile even if it is not an explosive one, so it's impossible in the practical sense to use a round which will land intact and sit there spewing smoke as does a smoke grenade.

      Willie Pete is how artillery and mortars accomplishes the marking (for spotting impact and correcting adjustments for follow-on explosive rounds) function. White phosphorus burns upon exposure to atmospheric oxygen, producing large volumes of white smoke that a forward observer can use to correct following fire. WP rounds are also referred to as marker rounds for this reason. They burst upon impact, spreading WP in a given area which then burns, creating smoke which can be seen by the F.O..

      It is a mis-perception (or deliberate mis-characterization for propaganda purposes) that the use of WP is banned by the Geneva Convention. It is only the deliberate use of WP against human targets which is a violation, and as you can imagine, not only is establishing intent difficult at best, it's just not a practical round to use most of the time. People take shelter from incoming, and unless some of it lands on you when the shell bursts, it's not something to worry about. It's what will come after it that is a concern.

      Being that it burns and only stops when there is none of it left to chemically react with the oxygen in the atmosphere, it excels at an incendiary effect, and this likewise is not a use of it banned by the Convention. Something burning is often exactly how the "spotting" effect is accomplished.

      Firing rockets at civilian targets (of course to a Palestinian, any Jew is a military target) and then crying foul when the IDF uses marker rounds to control at the accuracy of it's return fire is a bit hypocritical, especially when the whole experience could be avoided by not firing said rockets at Israeli civilians in the first place. Using marker rounds for accurate (or as accurate as artillery fire is likely to be) return fire on a known launch site is actually a bit more responsible than using high explosive rounds, especially in an urbanized area where such impacts are often almost impossible to see.

      Put it like this. Would you rather have them use 2-3 marker rounds to establish the target, then fire a half dozen HE rounds "for effect", or would you rather they use HE until they get it right, then fire that same half dozen rounds? Walking 10-15 (or more) HE rounds through a populated area until you eventually can spot an impact on your actual target is irresponsible and causes much more collateral damage/civilian casualties. I submit that the Palestinians do not actually want the IDF to stop using WP, they just want to be able to say they do. Or since they use their own civilian casualties as propaganda, maybe they would actually prefer that, "makes the Israelis look worse". LOL.

      Delete
    9. i really didn't want to get into this but a few points:

      1. "Firing rockets at civilian targets and then crying foul when the IDF uses.. is a bit hypocritical" - it would be if every palestinian crying foul had launched rockets at civilian targets but most palestinians dont fire rockets at anything, focusing on the fanatical fringe might make your views more palatable but its not an accurate reflection of the majority of palestinians.

      2. your point about wp not being banned by the geneva convention but the deliberate use of it against civilians is, is partly correct(or maybe it was a deliberate mischaracterization for propaganda purposes?)but the protocol you quoted also states the use is prohibited in civilian area's, oh.. but you think all palestinians are rocket-firing radicals, so i geuss there are no civilian area's in gaza? ...cant argue with that logic.

      3. put it like this, i would rather israel not use wp shells against civilians and by all reports it seems israel has agreed to phase out their use.. but hey maybe if you pitch your "2-3 marker round" argument to them you can get israel back round to your side.

      Delete
  6. how did maloney wind up in the chair? did he get shot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone initially claimed it was from ripping off the wrong person. However, someone else claims it was from a motorcycle accident which I think is more likely.

      Delete
  7. You should get some fresh air by wrapping your lips around an exhaust pipe! You delussional twat!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Does Shane wheel around the Newton Exchange/Library area?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not that I know of.
      Have you seen someone who looks like him rolling around that area?

      Delete
  9. "They're gonna call it New Girls on the Cell Block."

    LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As opposed to New Kids on the Block : )

      Delete
  10. I have a question ? There is a friend of my little brother who claims to be Larry Amero ,He post stories on facebook (Hell Angels) ,If there is a warrant this idiot post his stories on facebook including his whearabouts ,Im a little worried that he is gonna land some people including my brother in a lot of trouble

    ReplyDelete
  11. As far as I know Larry is in custody. He was out on bail after the Montreal bust but arrested again in the Australia Crystal Meth bust. He might have made bail again after that. Sounds like an imposter on Facebook though. A lot of people here want Larry dead.

    ReplyDelete