Sunday, August 3, 2014

Religion in the modern world



They say that religion and politics are the two subjects one should never discuss because they are so divisive. Yet they are of profound importance because they govern our civil liberty both in this life and in the life here after. Politicians start and end wars. Politicians support and oppose genocide. Politicians support and oppose civil liberty. Then there's the Devil. The author of slavery himself.

Some people say I don't believe in God. Do you believe in the devil? Do you believe in the existence of good and evil? Good and evil are empirical forces we can tangibly observe. Leaving religion aside, we can all concur that good and evil do exist. My mother used to always say there is a little bit of good in the worst of us and a little bit of bad in the best of us so it behooves us to look for the good in each other.

Recently I was speaking with a few parents about teaching children about religion so they can choose for themselves when they get older. How are the kids going to be able to choose if we don't teach them anything to choose from? One parent said their spouse didn't like the bible because it was written by a man. They said they can't believe anything that's written by a man. I have a hard time accepting that logic. The Constitution and the Charter of Rights were written by men. Those are inspired documents that protect our civil liberty. Clearly God can inspire men and women. Martin Luther King was certainly inspired.

It's somewhat ironic that the Hells Angels refer to their business meetings as church. Conducting business and betrayal of drug trafficking and prostitution is not godly. The top picture is of Adam Hall the Sergeant at Arms for the Pittsfield, Massachusetts Hells Angels and his co accused with devil horn implants and the number 666 tattooed to his forehead. Adam Hall has been accused of forced prostitution and of murdering a witness that was going to testify against him. His co accused looks like he needs some professional help.

I realize that 666 also means filthy few fellowship but this associate is not a patch holder and everyone knows that 666 has another meaning as well. Vincent Price's eloquent introduction to Iron Maiden's song 666 the number of the beast reaffirms the given that the number 666 also refers to the devil. It baffles me how any intelligent being would possibly brag about supporting evil and the father of all lies. AC/DC once said if you're evil, you're a friend of mine.

I have a hard time accepting that logic. Good and evil exist. Rape and murder is evil. Lying is evil. Betraying your friends for money is evil. If you do any of those things you can't be a friend of mine. Anyone who does any one of those things is untrustworthy. Embracing that is counter productive.

The essence of religion is treating others the way you want to be treated. That is the golden rule. It's common sense really. When I was young I enjoyed studying Zen as part of the martial arts. Alan Watts once said that the literal translation of the Greek word sin was to miss the mark. He said that if our purpose in life is to find happiness, then to sin would be to miss that mark like an archer misses his target. When we sin we do things that take us away from inner peace and lasting happiness.

I'm somewhat cynical of the hypocrisy and intolerance in organized religion yet I am a big supporter of the freedom of religion and agree that most religions teach us to improve our lives and treat each other the way we want to be treated. For me the existence of God is a given. It is scientific. The third law of thermo dynamics declares that in a closed system order does not increase all by itself.

If I throw a pile of wood and a bunch on nails on my front lawn, it won't magically build a house all on it's own in 300 or 3,000 years. In fact the opposite is the case. In 300 or a 3,000 years my house will begin to decay and fall apart. It's like the Mona Lisa. We cannot deny it exists and the thought that paint scattered across the canvass all by itself is rather absurd. Paintings have painters. Houses have builders. Creation has a creator.



Today I heard a reformed heroin addict who has been clean for 40 years cite Voltaire's argument who said when he sees a clock or a watch he knows those items were created they didn't just happen by chance. I remember many years ago going to the British museum in London England. I saw the skull of the missing link between man and ape which "proved" the "theory" of evolution.

They actually only had three small skull fragments they found from three different locations that fit on the back of the skull. They dated the fragments and said that because it comes from the time period where we think the missing link should have existed, they reconstructed a skull from those three fragments of what they thought the missing link might look like. Only they weren't reconstructing it based on other skulls from missing links they found. They created a brand new skull based on what they thought it might look like. When I saw that as a young man searching for truth I was pissed. That is not science. That is nonsense. All these years we were taught that was science when in reality it is anything but.

I have no problem if someone embraces the theory of evolution. Just remember it's a theory and is in reality very far from science. It's hard for me to conceive that the claim that man crawled out of the ocean, evolved from apes and ceases to exist when he dies is anything but intelligent or scientific. When we die and we realize we are still conscious of our surroundings, we will then know that teaching is false. To me it just seems so empty and incomplete.

I will be the first person to admit that I tend to trust atheists more than I trust many religions people simply because when an atheist does good they aren't doing it to get a reward, they are doing it because they believe it's the right thing to do. I find that admirable. With or without religion, with or without God or the Devil, Good and Evil do exist in our world and we are free to choose between the two. Christians are taught not to judge others but we are taught to judge between good and evil. Like it our not, life does not end at death and as we sow so shall we reap.



Piltdown Man: Britain's Greatest Hoax

18 comments:

  1. The Universe was created from a Big Bang...Hence, the need for a Creator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course, who do do you think set off the explosion?? :biggrin:

      Delete
    2. That's the whole point of the second law of thermodynamics. Explosions create disorder. If I blew up a building it would scatter and unorganize the building it wouldn't magically organize itself into a bigger better building. That defies both logic and science.

      Someone comes up with an unproven theory and calls it science. The claim that one large explosion created all the order in the universe just doesn't make sense because it defies the laws of science.

      It leaves us with the premise that man crawled out of the ocean and ceases to exist when he dies. That's pretty anti climatic. Compare that with Martin Luther King's premise that man is more than a whirling vagabond of electrons, man is a child of God. That has an infinite significance. The universe is there for us to explore. That's a lot more dramatic than crawling out of the ocean and ceasing to exist.

      Delete
    3. Hmm...well, consider that we are not talking about blowing anything up here, more the idea of an explosion in an empty space. And much like any other explosion, the products of it continue to spread outwards, the "blast radius" in this case being the expanding universe, as it has been measured to be doing exactly that.

      You are correct that it's just a theory. At the same time everyone seems to argue themselves silly as to which theory is correct while completely overlooking the idea that they may all be and that we just don't understand the different parts they have to play. Intelligent design, evolution, creation....these are not necessarily mutually exclusive. But people like to argue more than they like to resolve things, life is proof of that.

      Asimov once postulated that "technology sufficiently advanced in indistinguishable from magic". Apply that idea here.

      As well, God can do whatever he wants, however he wants. Also something to bear in mind. The fact that one of his creations thinks otherwise means jack.

      Delete
    4. I have no doubt there was an explosion that caused the universe to expand. I'm just saying explosions don't create order or life. Something else has to explain that.

      Delete
    5. When you cum an explosion creates life

      Delete
    6. I knew someone was gonna say that. That's different because it is a biological function within the human body. It's not some random explosion in space magically organizing matter. It's the sperm and the egg that creates life not the explosion. You plant a seed and water it then it begins to grow. Plant a coin or a rock and you can watter it all you want, it won't grow.

      Delete
  2. Then ultimate question! The beasts connection to the Great Whore! The Great City is what to the Whore as stated in the last book!
    You have an excellent and well composed article here!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it's harder to answer the question who isn't the great whore than to single out one group and pretend we aren't in danger of becoming it ourselves. I don't think the great and abominable church is limited to one single organization. There are plenty of TV evangelists that would fit that bill as well. Communism, the Hells Angels... they could all be considered the great and abominable church.


      Delete
  3. http://www.torontosun.com/2014/08/04/three-wounded-when-bullets-fly-outside-club
    It is everywhere on this long weekend!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, lots of gun violence in Toronto.

      Delete
  4. Not sure that people understand what a scientic theory means...
    A scientic theory, like gravity and evolution, has been proven and confirmed be science. Results can be recreated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No a scientific theory is not proven. The law of gravity has been tested and proven. A theory is exactly that, a theory. The scientific method is a pattern that we use to discover laws. We start by coming up with a hypothesis. We fabricate an answer to a question then conduct tests to prove or disprove the theory. The missing link skull found in England turned out to be a complete hoax: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/archaeology/piltdown_man_01.shtml

      Delete
    2. Not a thing about evolution has been proven. Who told you it was proven? If it was, it would no longer by a theory.

      The fact is the more research that is conducted the more the wacky theories of Darwin are being proven to be nothing but far-gone fantasies. Fantasies that have been pushed on an unsuspecting world by those with a political agenda.

      In fact, it was Marx and Engels who were prime promoters of Darwin - not because they thought he was right, but because Darwin's radical ideas helped support their radical theories of socialism - I will cite a source (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pzMHD0F4yQ) - I recommend the entire documentary, but watching just the first 12.5 minutes of this documentary will give background to Darwin, but you can skip to the 6 minute mark if you have to.

      What is really telling is how little discussion regarding evolution is allowed and of how it is promoted as "fact" when it is anything but!

      Delete
  5. A common misconception is that scientific theories are rudimentary ideas that will eventually graduate into scientific laws when enough data and evidence has been accumulated. A theory does not change into a scientific law with the accumulation of new or better evidence. A theory will always remain a theory; a law will always remain a law.[23][26] A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you copy that from Wikipedia?

      The first thing any student of academia learns is that wikipedia cannot be cited. It is full of mistruths, lies and is not peer-reviewed. Sorry, but you failed on this one.

      Delete