Friday, June 24, 2016

Britain Breaks Free



Well this is interesting. Scotland votes to stay in the UK and the UK votes to leave the European Union. Finally Britain awakes. There is a lot of absurd doom and gloom rhetoric complaining about their decision to abort the fraud but I will clarify the step forward. Everybody likes free trade and everybody wants to prosper. The problem with most of these trade agreements is that they have nothing to do with free trade and everything to do with giving up sovereignty.

After signing a treaty supporting a European Union, with no Constitution or Charter of Rights that binds future governments by law to protect civil liberty, what guarantee do you have that new Union remains a free republic as opposed to a galactic empire so to speak? With no Constitution or Charter of Rights you have absolutely no protection whatsoever. Civil liberty is lost and so is the Free Republic. So stop the doom and gloom nonsense. None of us are that stupid.

Holland has already expressed valid concerns to this Galactic Empire in the EU. Another one of the concerns is Banking fraud. Ireland was finally beginning to prosper. Then all of a sudden they were surprisingly hit with a huge bank fraud similar to Greece. The Irish are smart. Screw them over and they will not forget. A star hasn't fallen. It just broke free.

22 comments:

  1. The Globalists in Brussels and elsewhere are going to fight this tooth and nail, of that you can be sure. Already the EU has taken the trouble to say that until Britain actually leaves, they are still bound by all EU laws and regulations, and they are whipping up the panic level to increase pressure for a second vote. Let us hope they do not succeed, and that Britain will in fact secede.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No doubt the fraudsters will cry the sky is falling so they can steal Britain's cash and liberty. This time it's not Hitler it's an invasion of deception.

      Delete
  2. If one takes the time to examine the referendum results, it was the large metropolitan cities that voted to stay; just like the Quebec referendum.

    One can barely imagine the threats of economic uncertainty told to employees in large firms to scare them into voting to stay.

    The media is trying to pull out all the stops and whine and moan about how a second referendum needs to be conducted - yet, if they would have had the results reversed, they would have been adamant there was a clear and solid choice to stay and that decision must be respected. Period.

    Hopefully this will give other countrys' the incentive they need as well to stand up for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here's hoping. Down with Globalist Fascism!!

      Delete
  3. As a proud western Canadian . I am so happy to see Brittain free of her socialist chains . Now to replace the libs in Ottawa...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Could the west ever break free ? U imagine how awesome it could be . All that vlcrown land . For u and for me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure how the West separating would create more land. Although I agree the sky certainly wouldn't fall if Quebec or the West separated I do think we would be diminished one without the other. Diversity makes us strong.

      Delete
    2. To a point, yes, but only if those who make up the totality of the body politic are united by a shared vision, shared beliefs, and shared standards which surpass their individual origins. The FFL takes in recruits from the world over, but they all pledge their loyalty to the Legion, not to France. "Legio Patria Nostra", the legion is our homeland. That, and the American melting pot of past years is the way in which diversity is a strength. "From many, one."

      If not, diversity is a weakness that allows ruthless politicians and other movers and shakers to achieve their thievery and corruption more easily, there is less resistance as the whole of the people are not united behind anything. How many hyphen-Canadians think of themselves as Canadians first and foremost? Damn few I'll tell you, and if they say that when you ask it's mostly because they know it's the expected answer.

      Part of where Canada (and Europe) are right now is because they fell hok/line/sinker for the Leftist/Globalist version of diversity. I can promise you that a good bit of the Brexit vote going the way it did was because of the EU immigration policies that GB has had rammed down it's throat to the point where there are Muzzy area's the police don't go except in force. Germany, France, Belgium, all the same. They have been invaded, and they know it, and they want their country back. If you think the Globalists in Brussels at EU HQ didn't know exactly what they were doing, you're mistaken.

      Delete
    3. The failed concept of "multiCULTuralism" is the model that Canada has been trying to shove down the throats of the populace since the first Trudeau was in office.

      As much as it might seem, on the surface, like a good idea, it only ends being an hollow token where individuals are allowed to wear some clothing and cook some food. It is truly a superficial tokenism.

      So what then does it do? (http://archives.sspx.org/against_sound_bites/multiculturalism.htm)



      PS - Note that Dinesh D'Souza is cited a few times in the above article.


      Since nature abhors a vacuum, if the West did separate (ask Doug Christie about the success of that campaign) the vacuum left would allow even more liberalism, as we saw in the French "revolution" to grasp its claws and talons into our society.

      Delete
    4. As far as I'm concerned this whole multiculturalism hate is nazi fascism. This is the wrong blog to promote that kind of hate. My parents raised me differently. They taught me to respect and cherish cultural diversity and from what I've seen in my years of travel around the world is that they were right. I do not believe in the Adolf Hitler model. We fought that kind of hate in the war for a reason. I believe in the Hamilton model because I am proud to be a Canadian. This is not the American melting pot. This is the great Canadian Mosaic and we have every reason to be proud of it:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9rFprD_Qf4

      Delete
  5. The Guardian article on Saturday may have said it best, "if you got money, you vote in.....if you haven't got money, you vote out".

    the bureaucratic rules certainly didn't help the E.U.'s position in G.B. and some of them were down right weird.

    some preliminary analysis of the voting reflects aging baby boomers wanted out, younger people wanted to stay. Those living in large centres who were doing well, wanted to stay, but in poor areas, they wanted out. In my opinion much of this can be laid at the door of the Conservatives who year after year had cut health, education, housing, etc. For those not part of the "good life", the arrival of more people in the country didn't seem like a good idea. With so little they weren't into "sharing". Income inequity doesn't help anyone and in this case may have contributed to the "exit".

    its hard to get ahead in a country which is classist and then hampered by a poor education system.

    The campaigns run by some "leavers" were racist in nature blaming foreigners for everything and anything. However, if you look at history and at those such as Mosley and Enoch Powell all that changed were the dates and the names.

    Part of the problem is the E.U. expanded into countries which were not on a level playing field with the original 6 countries. The expansion worked for corporations who were able to move capital easily to benefit from lower salaried workers in former eastern block countries.

    You can not blame people for wanting a better life and given movement was free, they moved.

    The exit by GB may cause other countries to vote to leave. Some former eastern block countries may say they want to, but they have benefited from the infrastructure upgrades provided by the E.U. Then they didn't want to participate in the allocation of refugees. the original 6 may be getting tired of "carrying the load" and decide to leave.

    A country needs to control its own borders. the e.u. changed that.

    G.B. with its social problems, people at the bottom of the economic scale had had enough and weren't prepared to "share". Had Cameron not dismantled the social system, who knows people might not have been so angry that they wanted to leave the E.U. They had to blame some one or something for their plight and its not always fun to have to blame yourself for voting into office a government which doesn't have the interests of the average worker in mind, only the financial elite.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a lot of speculation about this and that but the clear results show that England and Wales overwhelmingly voted to leave. It was almost a blackout while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay.

      I'm a little bit surprised about Northern Ireland. When I was living there concerns were raised then about the possibility of joining with the EU which would mean the border between the North and South would drop and Ireland would finally become a nation once again. Unfortunately the opposite would be true. Not only would Northern Ireland no longer be a nation, Scotland and England would cease to be one as well.

      The EU fraud is scamming both the rich and the poor with false propaganda. It's like the propaganda war over the Ukraine. It's driven by the intelligence community because it is tied to the banking fraud which the intelligence community is neck deep in. Ripping off taxpayers by stealing their money and their liberty.

      Delete
    2. Let us hope that one of the side effects of the well deserved death of the EU is that Ireland shall once again be one nation.

      Delete
    3. That too is problematic. In Northern Ireland 49% want to cut ties with England and join the Republic but 51% do not.

      Delete

  6. My comment about western separation and crown land . Let me explain . It is my opinion . That of the west left confederation . All the current land owned now by the crown . Would be opened up for development and homesteading . This would be a huge boom for hard working westerners

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see. But if the West was to separate, wouldn't all that crown land become owned by the new government of the West? Putting all that crown land in the hands of someone like Christy Clark is kind of scary.

      It's reminiscent of public assets becoming private then disappearing just like in Greece. Reminds me of a Mel Gibson quote in the movie the Patriot: "Why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away? An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a King can."

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEUEAloFdkc

      Delete
  7. Fair enough . I don't see someone like Christy clark having any say in a free west tho. I would think the western capital would go to calgary . I can see a good life of saw mills farms and oil wells . Everyone would be well employed . I really don't see a downside . Lazy hippies cam starve for all I care

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One would think someone from Alberta would be much more fiscally responsible and better suited to govern. Unfortunately, Stephen Harper was from Alberta. He was no Preston Manning. He was just as bad as Brian Mulroney. Tax and spend for his buddies in corporate monopolies. He did not support a free market nor was he fiscally responsible.

      Delete
  8. Also I would hope any new western government would be open for business . Gotta agree with u about Gibson and the Patriot tho. If that's how it played out and we just switched one inept worthless leftist government . For another worthless tax and spend liberal government . Yes we would still be over the barrel so to speak

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Business is good. Corporate Monopolies are bad. We need to support a free market. Fiscal responsibility is important. Some people just don't get it.

      Delete
  9. Now, lets get this Global Revolution started, well overdue
    Stop listening, reading watching the CPM Corporate Paid Media
    The Deliberate Dumbing Down of the World works way to well, lets wake-up while we still have a place to wake up to.

    Brussels is more corrupt then imaginable - so is our own Government, from local to provincial and last but not least federal.

    We got the people power, why for crying out loud don't we use it?
    Lets All stand up and their Game is over


    ReplyDelete
  10. Why?

    Because they have enforcers bought and equipped with your own money, many of whom are confused about why they are in the position they are. They joined "to help people" but if they don't do what they are told at roll call, they're out of a job and their family goes hungry. They were selected because they were willing to use force. Sometimes (against criminals) this is appropriate but there are those among them who want to move up that are not above being used by the powers that be for their ends if they get something out of the deal. These are Law Enforcement Officers, but not Peace Officers. Those are the people you will face if you take to the streets to tear down the corruption that has taken root while you were pursuing your own day to day life, and not paying attention. There are more of you than of them, but you were disarmed years ago "for your own protection". Do you see now who's protection it really was for? It was for THEIR protection, from YOU. They knew this day might come, when you'd had enough, and they wanted you ill equipped to resist if that day ever came. Suckers.....

    It is said that the price of liberty is eternal vigilance. People in Canada are more apathetic than vigilant, far too slow to speak up, (don't want to be like those Americans you know) and quite frankly were very easily used by the politicians of the last 45-50 years.

    You get the government you are willing to accept. It must be asked, why were you willing to accept this? Why was Gordon Campbell not tarred and feathered when he and his cronies stole BC Hydro? When agricultural land was reclassified and sold to crooked developers, where were you? When drug dealers stand openly in the streets selling their poison, did you attack these predators as a decent civilized person should? You did none of these things. "Not your problem." Yes it is, IT'S YOUR FAULT. You allowed the thieves and the charlatans to do what they wanted with no EFFECTIVE resistance. Maybe you said what Baaaah-d (sheeple sound) people they were. So what, do you think they care for your opinion? And IF anyone attacked these predators and parasites, you would probably agree with your oppressors when they cried out that they were being victimized.

    Go back to watching TV, stuffing your face and paying your taxes slave, and let your betters rule you.

    ReplyDelete