Saturday, October 8, 2016

Freeway Ricky: Crack in the System



Shortly after the movie came out about the Gary Webb Story called Kill the Messenger, another similar movie was due to be released about the Freeway Ricky connection called Freeway: Crack in the System. Only I was unable to find and purchase a copy. One blog reader recently wrote in and asked me about the film and I just found it posted online. It is also worth watching.

So let's review the content of the film and go over what they got right and what they left out after they opened Pandora's box. The most important puzzle piece this film reveals is Freeway Ricky's direct connection to Blandon. That ties in directly with the Gary Webb story. Gary Webb revealed that the CIA were directly responsible for the US Crack epidemic in the 1980's. It was all part of Iran Contra. That's one thing this film got right. Iran Contra wasn't about selling Iran Arms to release hostages. It was about selling Iran Arms to raise money for the Contra Rebels in Nicaragua. That was the initial motive behind the CIA's prolific drug traficking.

It happened while Reagan was in office but Reagan wasn't the author of it. George Bush Sr. was and it later ties in with the Clintons in Mena Arkansas. Gary Webb clearly established that Oscar Danilo Blandón was the one bringing in the CIA's cocaine into the US to fund the Contra rebels in Nicaragua. That documents the fact that Freeway Ricky was unknowingly selling crack for the CIA and made a colossal amount of money doing so.

So Gary Webb was right. The CIA has been actively involved in drug trafficking since the Vietnam war. Operation Fast and Furious showed that Iran Contra never stopped. They're still doing it now.

The other interesting twist to this movie is the account of the DEA agent seen in the above picture with Freeway Ricky. He talked about how they targeted Ricky after the feds pulled the plug on their conviction of Oscar Danilo Blandón. When the DEA arrest a drug dealer they often offer a plea bargain to get him to turn on his supplier. Catching the bigger fish is more effective at stopping the drug trafficking network. It is somewhat puzzling that after the CIA protected Oscar Danilo Blandón from conviction, they used him to trap one of his dealers, Freeway Ricky.

Initially one would have to ask why would they do that? Why would they use a supplier to bust a dealer? Normally it's the other way around. Why would they let the supplier continue doing business and avoid jail time for doing so and pay him a salary while they are at it? Because it was the CIA behind the drug trafficking all along. Perhaps that's why the DEA agents went corrupt just like the New York cops in the 75th Precinct did.

In this movie, the DEA agent admits that after the feds pulled the plug on their investigation into Oscar Danilo Blandón they started keeping part of the money they were seizing from drug traffickers for themselves. He admits the new directive wasn't to get drugs off the streets, it was to seize as much drug money as they could to fund operations. Letting them keep finder fees for themselves shows how the CIA infiltrated the DEA which eventually lead to Operation Fast and Furious that Hillary Clinton authored and Obama used executive privilege to cover up.

I am not against the war on drugs. I am simply pointing out that the CIA is on the wrong side of that war. I am not anti American. I am simply pointing out that the CIA are. They are the ones killing the Constitution as we speak. Fighting Communism is a good thing. I'm just saying that the end does not justify the means. Selling crack is not the way to do it. Not only that, but that motive is yet another fraud. They aren't trying to stop the communists. They are the communists. Their investment fraud crashing world banks ties into Wall Street, the Greek Financial crisis and Communist China's takeover of the free world. Communist China is the biggest threat to world peace on the planet and we are all kissing their ass while they do it.

8 comments:

  1. Excellent points, and all the same actors are still in play....look how "revelations" about Donald Trump using profanities are being used as we speak to distract from the latest Wikileaks dump proving that Hillary Clinton wants open borders and a hemispheric "free trade" (LOL) zone.

    To quote Gary Webb, we're not talking about a conspiracy theory, we're talking about a conspiracy. Note all the "Republicans" who previously endorsed Trump now withdrawing their support. They are hoping this will torpedo his chances, because the Republican Establishment never wanted him anyway, he's an outsider and can't be counted on to play the game according to their rules.

    This may be our last chance to change the present course of things at the ballot box. Because if Hillary gets in, we are all screwed, and yes I mean Canada too. Dick Morris was a trusted Clinton advisor for many years. I recommend his book "Armageddon", wherein he exposes more of the Clinton Crime family secrets, and makes the case that Hillary is every bit Bill's equal as a threat to liberty and political accountability, and then some. The political establishment on both sides doesn't want to be accountable, it's the last thing they want, and they are and have been working very hard to eliminate the system of checks and balances which requires it of them.

    The hour is late......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it's a done deal. Hillary speaks like a president in the debates. It's the republican's own fault for nominating an idiot. Oh but wait, if all the republicans are pulling their support of Trump how did he get the nomination? That's the conspiracy. The Agency made sure a raging lunatic got the nomination so their dirty criminal would win. Welcome to the new world order. China here we come.

      Making a big deal about some locker room talk and completely ignoring Hillary Clinton authoring Operation Fast and Furious is the perfect example of how the fraud is being perpetuated in the media.

      Delete
    2. Trump is an idiot? LOL you been brain washed too eh Dennis?

      Delete
    3. I think Trump is a raging lunatic but I also think Hillary is pure evil. The nomination process is broken and needs to be fixed.

      Delete
    4. This is what I'm getting at...Trump looks great, compared to Hillary. Should be a landslide victory.

      Delete
    5. Compared to Hillary Trump does look great. However, I'm not so sure about the election being a landslide victory in his favor. Time will tell. Either option is concerning.

      https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-sSFpqh7ETZE/V6NAxjtSvkI/AAAAAAAAapE/K2FsA7VFq-gu0M25J0TTYtTVBUwqZohVwCLcB/s1600/hilltrump.png

      Delete
  2. I didn't say all the Republicans nominated him. I said "Note all the Republicans who previously endorsed him WHO ARE withdrawing, etc.. Read carefully, that is a much smaller group than ALL. At the moment it's actually 2 or 3, Paul Ryan being the most predictable.

    The Republicans didn't nominate him, people who voted in the Republican primary did. The Republican Establishment had no choice, he beat the pants off their chosen alternatives, Jebby Bush and Marco Rubio, and they've been trying to find a way to torpedo his electoral chances ever since. Notice how fast his trusted running mate Mike Pence issued a statement that basically stabbed Trump in the back. Don't think that guy wouldn't be happy to step up if Trump withdrew. (This will not happen.) And at this point the Republican establishment (all the guys you have NOT seen hide nor hair of since the convention because they would rather vote for Hillary, guys like Lindsey Graham and John McCain) would be happy to have him, because he's one of them. Trump is not. Trump scares them, he threatens to undo a lot of seditious behavior on their part, and given the amount of money/influence etc. behind the Globalist New World Order, I predict an assassination attempt against Trump either before or after the election, if not before then certainly after. The forces of darkness cannot afford to lose, and losing is a less attractive option than being exposed ex post facto as being behind such an attempt. It would be far from the first coverup they'd ever had to do.

    People need to realize that George Soros and the Clintons vs. the Bush's and other so called conservatives, while appearing and presenting themselves to be on opposite sides are in fact working hard for the same thing. Power seeks to grow and to perpetuate itself. This reality supplants things like freedom and the Constitution. The elites are addicted to mmoney and power, and they have about as much desire to kick the habit as any junkie. Meaning none.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't base my statement on yours. The fact that many republicans are pulling their endorsement of him leads one to question how he got the nomination. The nomination process is broken and needs to be fixed in both parties. There is no Clintons vs Bushes. They are on in the same. Bill was in bed with George Sr.

      Delete