Sunday, June 11, 2017

False accusations at the Kelowna muder trial



One moment please... this post needs to be amended. The police witness in the Kevin Leclair murder trial is different than the police witness in the Jonathan Bacon murder trial but my point remains the same. The former Kelowna gang associates mentioned in th article was in no way whatsoever involved with the shooting of Larry Amero and James Riach. He was their friend and did not set them up. To imply otherwise is simply dishonest.

Revision: Kim Bolan is attending the murder trial of Jonathan Bacon. As we previously reported, the credibility of the police informant in the Kevin LeClair murder trial is non existent. Every word that comes out of that loser's mouth is a lie. The witness admitted to lying to the police on a regular basis even after he started working for the police. The witness told the court that he would regularly post false information on Kim Bolan's blog to throw the police off just like a troll involved in the Britney Irving murder we all know and hate.

The latest inconsistency is a distorted report in the Jonathan Bacon murder trial about a former Kelowna gang associate. We know that the crown bends over backwards to protect the identity of police informants. The court saw a video of the former gang associate inside the Delta Grand near the front entrance. In opening remarks the crown claims the former associate who has since left the life and got a real job, told an associate of the accused that Amero and Riach were in Kelowna that weekend. OK so what does that really mean?

The fact that Larry Amero and Jonathan Bacon were in Kelowna that weekend was no secret. It was their coming out party. They were running around loud and proud on that stupid boat "Steroids and Silicone" trying to pick a fight in public broadcasting the Hells Angels support of the Bacon Brothers. That is why Spike's neice was tragically present. Larry wasn't acting against the clubs wishes he was supporting them. That is why they gave him two huge operations in Montreal after he was shot endorsing Jonathan Bacon. If the Hells Angels put a contract on Larry, they would not have protected him in Montreal and gave him more work after the shooting.

Yes there is video footage of the former gang associate at the hotel they were staying in. He visited them there. Although Jonathan Bacon did not trust the former gang associate the former gang associate knew and liked Larry Amero. He did not betray that friendship. Although everyone hated Jonathan Bacon, that gang associate would never have put Larry at risk because he was his friend. This forces us to question the tainted testimony.

Why would the crown put the life of a former gang associate at risk who is clearly not involved in the case and why would a credible news reporter put his life at risk by running with that tainted testimony? It smells suspicious. The crown's evidence is that the former Kelowna gang associate who was a personal friend of Larry Amero and did have UN contacts told a friend that Larry and James Riach was in town. Big deal. That was no secret. Everyone else knew it.

I know exactly what happened. The former gang associate was friends with Larry Amero and went to meet with them at the Grand. This was known years ago. Jonathan saw the former associate and because the former associate had friends who were UN, Jonathan texted Larry and asked Larry to tell his friend to leave so he did. That's it. The former associate was not involved in the plot to kill Jonathan Bacon and shoot Larry Amero. That is a bold faced lie.



If the former gang associate was involved in the conspiracy to shoot Larry Amero and James Riach, why would the former gang associate store Larry's boat and truck at his house after the shooting and why would he give James Riach a ride home to Vancouver from Kelowna afterwards? Because he was not involved and the crown twisted the testimony out of context.



Just to set the record straight, the two police witnesses in this trial were involved in this murder and were charged in it. They both copped a plea to get a reduced sentence. The police witness was the one who told Manny that Larry, James and Jonathan were at the Grand Matt did not.

Personal Privilege

On a matter of personal privilege, I will clarify that when the former Kelowna gang associate was in the life I gave him the nickname Matt the Rat. I picked that name simply because it rhymed and because I felt that anyone involved in that life was a rat. I did not ever intend to imply that he was ever a police informant. I never implied that then and do not now.

Matt left the life without becoming a police informant and is pretty much the shining example of everything this blog stand for. I realize the police want to create false charges against him in hopes that he will testify against some of him old associates. I personally think that is sleazy. Falsely accusing someone of being a rat is pathetic. They did the same thing to Britney Irving and used that lie as a rationalization for killing her. This is why we need to be responsible with regards to publishing false allegations made in court because someone could end up dead over it.

I would also like to clarify that I am not a journalist, I am an activist. When a journalist goes to court they simply repeat what was said by either side. One day it's the defense argues this and the next day it's the crown argues that. Just because either side submits an argument, that does not mean the judge will accept and agree with that argument.

Likewise, not everything witnesses say in court is true. After cross examination the court must put the testimony to the test of believability. They must ask is it consistent with the known facts? Does it make sense? Is it believable? An activist doesn't simply report on every false claim made in court. An activists compares the claims with the known facts. That is what I have done in this case. It is not an attack on a journalist who simply reported what they heard in court. It is an attack on the false testimony the police witness gave in court.

11 comments:

  1. Are u saying that you believe Schrader is innocent? Reformed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely on both counts. There is not a snowball's chance in hell he had anything whatsoever to do with the shooting of Larry Amero or James Riach. He was their friend and remained true to that friendship. He did get a real job and is no longer involved in that life. Multiple sources have confirmed that.

      Delete
  2. it will be interesting to see what the judge rules when it comes to the informants credibility.

    given the reporting you are doing here, I'd conclude the Crown might have been better off not using the "informant". Doesn't sound like the brightest tool in the shed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes the police informant in the Kevin LeClair case is a flaming idiot with zero credibility because every word that comes out of his mouth is a bold faced lie. However, I initially had him mixed up with the police witness in the Jonathan Bacon murder trial. They are in fact two separate people.

      Delete
  3. Your lies and delusions are going to get you into a lot of trouble. You have no knowledge of what went on. You have no connections to that world.You are a loser that has no life beside pounding on your keyboard. You are sad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm shaking in my boots. I haven't broken the publication ban. Blaze is not your real name. So now we have Blaze publicly trashing Schrader. Imagine that. You are the delusional liar. Just ask anyone who knows you. Implying that Schrader had anything to do with the shooting of his friends is a bold faced lie. But then again you are paid well to lie in court aren't you. Lean back Judas B*tch:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7yzEyO7Wnk

      Delete
    2. most of us who post comments here are discussing the article. We do not come here to attack the blogger. So please, if you can't say anything nice and/or constructive or on topic, some of us really don't want to read your attacks on the blog owner.

      We don't all agree on topics when we comment on this blog, but Mr. Watson is the owner of the blog and if we don't like what he has to write, we can move it along to another blog. Perhaps you might find it easier on yourself if you no longer visited Mr. Watson's blog.

      I for one am not here to read the "garbage" you spew regarding Mr. Watson or the threats. Most people who read and comment on blogs do it to participate in an exchange of ideas.

      Delete
  4. Boy you sure are in the know. Do you think you will get called to testify, and clear up all the lies?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I most certainly will. I can't wait to testify against you at the judgement bar of God for the murder of Brittney Irving. Erin go Bragh, Tiocfaidh ár lá.

      Delete
  5. What would you think of being featured in an integrity for blogs. We would use your claims and then publish the truth about them. A good example would be you lies about NYC and the guardian angels.Working in South Seattle. Your claims of contacts which don't exist. I guess to link it would have to have gangsters out in the name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are a f*cking idiot. Look on pages 74 and 75 in Lisa Sliwa's book Attitude Common Sense Defense for Women. The three pictures of the brother in the dew rag on the top are of Reggie. The three pictures of the white guy with a goatee on the bottom are of me. We did that photoshoot when I was in New York City:

      https://www.amazon.com/Attitude-Lisa-Sliwa/dp/0517561875

      Look at all the pictures the freak Ace Ventura posted of me in colors. You have mental problems. Take the deal Blaze and disappear.

      Delete